I have had the privilege of attending an advance
screening of The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Peter
Jackson’s The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey movie adaptation is the first
installment of three films from the acclaimed novel by J.R.R. Tolkien. It is
the prelude of The Lord Of the Rings. The follows the journey of a hobbit named
Bilbo Baggins. Baggins leaves his comfortable lifestyle to embark on an
adventure with 13 dwarfs and a wizard named Gandalf. The purpose of the
adventure is to reach the treasures guarded by a dragon.
The main excitement behind the release of this film
is having the option to see the film in 24fps 3-D, 48 fps 3-D, or 24fps 2-D. But most movie viewers do not necessarily know the difference.The term "fps" stands for frames per second. A majority of films are
projected in 24fps. The frames per second are how fast the images are projected
per second. To simply put it, the higher the frame rate, the sharper the
image and less blurry the film will appear.
This film was definitely entertaining. I am still have not made up my
mind on whether I particularly like it or not. I felt the movie was longer than it needed to
be. It did not help that the key to the projector was not programmed correctly,
so we had to wait almost an hour for the film begin. It turned a three hour
event into a four hour event. I saw the film in 48fps in 3-D. Yes, it was a
visually appealing movie, with fantastic visual effects, but since it was a
prequel to an already successful trilogy, I felt it took away from what
Lord of the Rings originally delivered. At the same time, I understood Peter
Jackson’s approach. The Hobbit is a kid friendly novel and creating the film in
48fps gave it a kid friendly feel. The movie does evolve into a progressively
dark film. The Hobbit was definitely a successful return to Middle Earth. Outside of the technical aspect of the films, I would suggest this film
to any Lord of the Rings fan.
