Trends in Filmmaking

There are several trends circulating the movie industry and the trends are always changing. It is important to notice and follow the trends of the movie industry to stay ahead of the game. The industry trends can assist knowing what genre of films audiences want, the type of content audiences would like to see, how movies are being distributed, and so much more.

If you are looking to write a script, it is important to recognize the script trends. A scriptwriter can write all the scripts in the world, but there is one important factor that should be taken into place. The script needs to be put in front of a producer and agent. In the industry, that is the only way a script will be seen. If the script is believed to be something that industry leaders will be interested in, push to get the script on the Black List. An intern, who worked at Leonardo DiCaprio’s company, created the Back List seven years ago. The intern originally created the listed as a Christmas holiday list, and then it became an industry honors list. If your script makes it on the Black List, it will be guaranteed that the top producers and agents will read the script.

One major trend that tends to keep resurfacing Hollywood is book to movie adaptations and remakes of old films. At this point in history, every movie plot has been created. The question now is, “who can tell the story better.” The most successful book to movie adaptations has been adapted from teen novels such as Twilight, The Hunger Games, and the new franchise: Divergent. A strong benefit from investing in create book to movie adaptations is that before the movie is even officially in pre-production, there is already a strong following from readers. It helps begin marketing with fans of the book putting out who they think should be casted for the characters and builds a lot of hype.

Another trend is the type of equipment used to create films called lo fidelity filmmaking. Filmmakers are using DSLR’s instead of large industry standard cameras. Filmmakers are even using GoPro cameras.

Films are also utilizing film festival outlets. Distributors are strategically using film festivals as a jump-start to distribute a film. If a film can generate a buzz throughout the festival realm, it has a chance of doing well in theatres. Going the festival route can prove to be a slower process, but it has been deemed successful.

Why does Pitch Perfect work?

We have reached a time where musical comedies are becoming tiresome. The hype is still there, but the implementation is less than exciting. When Pitch Perfect was first released, the expectations for the movie were low. Yes, the trailers were funny, but that always poses the question, “Were those all the funniest moments in the movie?” When the advertisements began, it was instantly compared to the television show, Glee, because of the “organizing singing” concept. After the first weekend premiere, the word began to spread about how audiences were surprised at how well the movie was executed. It quickly began forming a cult following, grossing $65 million in the box office .

Pitch Perfect is about an aspiring DJ, Beca (Anna Kendrick), who is forced to test out college first before moving to Los Angeles to begin her DJ career. Her dad, who is a professor at the university she attends, urges Beca to partake in one club activity. In return he will pay for her to live in Los Angeles. She auditions for the all female a cappella singing group, the Bellas and begins her journey from there. The Bellas are known for singing oldies and staying in a safe zone. This makes it difficult for them to surpass their school and competition rivals, the Troubletones. It was not until Beca finally convinces the co-captain that mixing up old and contemporary songs is a good thing that the Bellas start to connect. 

Why did Pitch Perfect work so well? It was realistic. It did not follow the rule of a traditional “musical move”. The motives for the singing were clear and guided the movie appropriately. None of the characters sporadically busted out in song singing about their feelings at that particular moment. The characters in the movie just want to create entertaining music, and develop success from their hard work.

Pitch Perfect also had the most diverse and well oiled cast to carry the movie. The movie was carried brilliantly through the characters more than the plot of the film. Kay Canon, who is the writer of 30 Rock and New Girl, created one of the most appealing characters for a movie of this stature. Each character had their own quirk that made the characters lovable. It was definitely refreshing to see new faces in a movie.

Overall, it is definitely a must see movie, regardless of whether you think you may enjoy it or not. With outstanding performances and musical numbers, there is something in it for everyone.

Distribution for Independent Filmmakers

The hardest part about being an independent filmmaker is distributing the film through the appropriate distribution outlets. It is imperative to understand that choosing the right distributor is crucial. The distributor should be able to distribute the content through several different outlets: Video on Demand, DVDs, television, theatrical distribution and so on.

When a filmmaker signs a deal with a distribution company, the deal is called a Gross Adjusted Deal. The deal involves the distribution company paying the filmmaker an advanced fee then the distribution company and the filmmaker split the revenues generated. There is one thing that should be cleared up: the advanced payment mirrors a promise from the distributor that he will push to ensure the filmmaker gets the best benefits from signing with the company. It motivates the distributor to look out for the best interest in the filmmaker’s success.

The deal that filmmakers should be wary of is the First Dollar Split deal. The deal is when the filmmaker and the distributor do a 50-50 spilt and the distributor does not include an advanced payment, which can be a large disadvantage to the filmmaker. When the distributor makes the First Dollar Split deal, the distributor lacks motivation and may choose to leave the film on the shelf until the contract expires.

Most independent filmmakers do not have a strong reputation. So, it is important to market the film well. The independent film must display some aspects in marketing itself. If the filmmaker does not see the potential in the film potentially marketing itself, then it will be hard to find a distributor to distribute the film.

Sometimes, depending on the project, self-distribution can be the most beneficial option. This can be used as a last resort. This is once the filmmaker has done everything possible to find a distributor that believes in the project, and has walked away without closing a deal. Amazon.com offers great self-distribution opportunities that are utilized by a wide variety of genres. The filmmaker can use this as an opportunity to build a following and show a potential distributor the advantages of assisting in distributing the content.

Being an independent filmmaker means understanding the advantages and disadvantages of all aspects of producing the film. Distribution should take an extensive amount to planning and strategizing to maximize profit.

Legal Issues in the Entertainment Industry

Entertainment Law Update: Faulkner,Einstein, Superman, and Talent Managers Podcast provided some interesting insight, especially in regards to copyright infringement and misappropriation of likeness.  The podcast hosts mentioned a case in which a picture of a couple was used in a negative light for a strong anti organization advertisement. The organization cropped the couple out, placed them on a new background, and claimed the picture as an original photograph.  The organization tried to pursue the case stating the edited photograph as fair use. Copyright infringement regarding photographs has been an ongoing issue. If my company, Front Row Pictures, were to provide still photographs of the production and post it online, the photographs could be used as part of an advertisement for another company. The conflict sits with the issues of another company receiving income on an original photograph used in advertisement, and not compensating the original owner.

This also coincides with original music created under the company, if we choose to do so. The musical artists may or may not want the original music to be used and distributed outside the company, usually in a political aspect. But how does an artist protect their first amendment right to prevent their music for being used, through any manor, in a political advertising campaign? Tamera Bennett of Entertainment Law claimed that there is not an available license that prevents political campaigns from licensing and using an artist’s song; despite the musician’s political viewpoints.

In the Entertainment Law Update:Holmes, Zorro and the Tin man walk into a bar...  podcast; we once again encounter a case in copyright infringement. The Broadway shows “Jersey Boys” was sued for using a seven second clip from the Ed Sullivan in the show without using the proper licensing. The court ruled in favor of Jersey Boys and stated that the video is fair use. In situations such as these, it is frustrating trying to control content publicly released. If the Ed Sullivan Show had a more elaborated copyright protection, they would have won the case. Generally, when a creative works displays copyrighted content, the content used cannot be claimed as fair use. The clip used was using factual information, so it was difficult to protect the video.

Listening to the podcasts helped identify reoccurring legal issues that are highlighted in the entertainment industry. It brought to my attention that it is imperative to go through the proper precautions to protect all works cr

Copyright Infringement, Is It Out of Control?

After spending time browsing Hollywood Reporter Esq, I noticed there is a trend in the entertainment industry with copyright infringement There are a few stories that imply the ongoing trend in the industry.

Peteski Productions, Dr. Phil’s production company, brought about a lawsuit against Gawker Media. The lawsuit is focused on Gawker Media posting footage on Deadspin.com, from the Dr. Phil show, about the Manti Te’o girlfriend hoax. The footage was posted several hours before the episode air. In result, this jeopardized the rating and viewers.

Gawker released the footage as exclusive and claimed the footage was their own. They gained some profit from their readers about the breaking news.

Since the Internet has become such a vital source of passing along information, new issues about infringement are arousing. As the Internet is developing, it is getting more difficult each day to monitor copyright infringement. After the post was made, Gawker cut down the video to clips instead. I do not have a problem with someone posting footage of someone else’s, as long as the credit is given.

In 2010, Caitlin Sanchez, the young voice actress who played the Dora in Dora the Explorer filed a lawsuit against Nickelodeon saying that she was bamboozled into signing a contract. At the time, she was underage, and the network assigned her a lawyer. Sanchez claims that she was given only twenty-two minutes to sign the contract. Because of the pressure and short amount of time, she signed a contract that had high lawyer contingency fees and tax payments. This resulted in Sanchez earning very little money.

Even though Sanchez felt she had no control over the situation, she should have tried to take control of the situation. It appeared Nickelodeon tried to maximize their profit under any circumstance. Nickelodeon hired an inexperienced lawyer to represent Sanchez, which backfired on her end.

In my opinion, Sanchez’s parents should have had an entertainment lawyer prior to showing up to review the contract the moment they knew their daughter received the job as Dora. They should have not let the network have control over who their lawyer should be. If, for unmentioned circumstances, they had to use the lawyer the network provided, they should have researched the lawyer and reviewed his history. When they would have saw how inexperienced the lawyer was, they could have requested a new lawyer.

This situation mirrors the advice Julee Milham delivered in her interview during the Full Sail guest lecture. She mentioned that contracts should be read as slow as possible to ensure full comprehension. If not, then the contract will get signed with several consequences. This is what happened to Sanchez, and because of that she technically worked for free.

Another story I encountered was a conflict between Michael Costanza and the producers of Paranormal Activity 4. Paramount was sued by Michael Costanza claiming that the Producers of Paranormal Activity 4, Steven Scneider and Spencer Medof, used some concepts from his screenplay without any form of acknowledgement. Constanza pitched his horror film called The Collingswood Story, back in 2002.

Situations, such as this one, happen often in the entertainment industry. It is important to copyright any and everything you can to protect written or visual work. Most screenplay writers only register their screenplays through the Writers Guild of America. The screenplay does not have the same protection if the screenplay were registered with the Copyright Office.

It is blatantly obvious that there needs to be a more strict method on maintaining the rights for works. But as the industry and Internet are developing, it is becoming nearly impossible for someone to prove that work is originally theirs.