After spending time browsing
Hollywood Reporter Esq, I noticed there is a trend in the entertainment
industry with copyright infringement There are a few stories that imply the
ongoing trend in the industry.
Peteski Productions, Dr. Phil’s production company, brought about a lawsuit against Gawker Media. The lawsuit is focused on Gawker Media posting footage on Deadspin.com, from the Dr. Phil show, about the Manti Te’o girlfriend hoax. The footage was posted several hours before the episode air. In result, this jeopardized the rating and viewers.
Gawker released the footage as exclusive and claimed the footage was their own. They gained some profit from their readers about the breaking news.
Since the Internet has become such a vital source of passing along information, new issues about infringement are arousing. As the Internet is developing, it is getting more difficult each day to monitor copyright infringement. After the post was made, Gawker cut down the video to clips instead. I do not have a problem with someone posting footage of someone else’s, as long as the credit is given.
In 2010, Caitlin Sanchez, the young
voice actress who played the Dora in Dora the Explorer filed a lawsuit against
Nickelodeon saying that she was bamboozled into signing a contract. At the
time, she was underage, and the network assigned her a lawyer. Sanchez claims
that she was given only twenty-two minutes to sign the contract. Because of the
pressure and short amount of time, she signed a contract that had high lawyer
contingency fees and tax payments. This resulted in Sanchez earning very little
money.
Even though Sanchez felt she had no control over the situation, she should have tried to take control of the situation. It appeared Nickelodeon tried to maximize their profit under any circumstance. Nickelodeon hired an inexperienced lawyer to represent Sanchez, which backfired on her end.
In my opinion, Sanchez’s parents
should have had an entertainment lawyer prior to showing up to review the
contract the moment they knew their daughter received the job as Dora. They
should have not let the network have control over who their lawyer should be.
If, for unmentioned circumstances, they had to use the lawyer the network
provided, they should have researched the lawyer and reviewed his history. When
they would have saw how inexperienced the lawyer was, they could have requested
a new lawyer.
This situation mirrors the advice Julee Milham delivered in her interview during the Full Sail guest lecture. She mentioned that contracts should be read as slow as possible to ensure full comprehension. If not, then the contract will get signed with several consequences. This is what happened to Sanchez, and because of that she technically worked for free.
Another story I encountered was a conflict between Michael Costanza and the producers of Paranormal Activity 4. Paramount was sued by Michael Costanza claiming that the Producers of Paranormal Activity 4, Steven Scneider and Spencer Medof, used some concepts from his screenplay without any form of acknowledgement. Constanza pitched his horror film called The Collingswood Story, back in 2002.
Situations, such as this one, happen often in the entertainment industry. It is important to copyright any and everything you can to protect written or visual work. Most screenplay writers only register their screenplays through the Writers Guild of America. The screenplay does not have the same protection if the screenplay were registered with the Copyright Office.
It is blatantly obvious that there needs to be a more strict method on maintaining the rights for works. But as the industry and Internet are developing, it is becoming nearly impossible for someone to prove that work is originally theirs.


